Two Leos on Church and State

Leo XIII held to the necessity of Catholic cultural supremacy grounded in its moral authority. The constitutional and legal status of the Church was secondary, contingent, negotiable.

As far as I can tell, Robert Prevost published nothing about public religion. It nonetheless would seem that the Leonine notion that the magisterium is social glue would seem to be beyond his ken. I am confident that Pope Leo XIV will never say, as did Leo XIII in 1900 in Tametsi Futura Prospicientibus, that “[w]herever Christianity rules over all without let or hindrance there the order established by Divine Providence is preserved, and both security and prosperity are the happy result.”

Read Full Article »


Comment
Show comments Hide Comments


Related Articles