Since the first state dinner in 1874, the United States has maintained a long-standing tradition of engaging in culinary diplomacy—a soft-power tool used to “increase bilateral ties by strengthening relationships through the use of food and dining experiences as a means to engage visiting dignitaries.” The recent eruption of multiple conflicts around the globe, however, reveals and confirms that culinary diplomacy cannot stand on its own. In the 21st century, no quantity of kebabs and challah could have prevented conflict between Israel, Iran, and now the United States.
How then should culinary diplomacy be thought of as a political tool? Harking back to the biblical tradition may provide guidance.
Read Full Article »