Can a Good Christian Be a Good (Classical) Liberal?

Can a good Christian also be a good liberal?  Prof. Kyle Swan â?? an assistant professor of philosophy at Cal State University, Sacramento â?? examines this question and the tension between religion and freedom.  We begin the discussion by defining â??liberalism,â? which we do not use in the sense that it is used in U.S. politics today, but rather in its classical sense emanating from the English/Scottish Enlightenment.  Prof. Swan uses â??liberalismâ? in the sense of the â??right to be left alone,â? which entails limits on the scope of government as well as a host of civil liberties such as the right to assemble.  He advances and explains a concept known as â??the liberty principleâ? and argues from pragmatic and epistemic perspectives why individuals should favor this variant of liberalism.  Following this, we bring religion into the mix and note that although many people like liberty, they also tend to be â??legal moralistsâ? who wish to impose their sense of morality on others.  It is possible, then, to see how Christianity and many other religions that profess a strong ethical code for human behavior might clash with the liberty principle.  Kyle provides some historical examples where this clash has occurred including reading from documents such as the Scotâ??s and Belgic Confessions that sought to combat the rise liberal thought in the 17th and 18th centuries.  Prof. Swan then makes the argument for why Christianity can co-exist with a liberal political philosophy in society, and how one can retain religious orthodoxy within a liberal society.  He reviews a famous debate between Patrick Devlin and H.L.A. Hart over sexual ethics.  Our conversation also covers topics such as â??nudgingâ? and how early Christians in the first three centuries and religious minorities in colonial British America dealt with this supposed tension between orthodoxy and liberalism.