The tears of actress Patricia Neal | The Taliban’s Christian victims | When death comes knocking | Don’t leave Cordoba reporting to pundits | Gay priest firestorm, in retrospect … | Complexities with conception and Islam | A room with a religious view | Julia Roberts’ Hindu practice | New byte of Apple faith | Haters gonna hate |2010 Archive >
The Taliban this weekend provided a tragic reminder of why short-term mission trips don’t pick Afghanistan as a destination. Ten murdered. But why?
The answer depends on which story you read — or at least how far into each story you read.
See, the Associated Press, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post each tell readers within the first five paragraphs that Taliban gunned down 10 members of a foreign aid team because they claimed they believed they were foreign spies there to preach Christianity.
The WaPo, for example, gives details early about the International Assistance Mission, via it’s executive director Dirk Frans:
The group is registered as a Christian nonprofit organization. Although its members do not shy away from this affiliation in this conservative Muslim country, Frans and others said they do not proselytize. In their work since 1966 on health and economic development projects, under King Zahir Shah, the Russians, the mujaheddin government and the Taliban, Frans said, “all along we’ve been known as a Christian organization. That has been a nonissue.”
“This is truly a bedrock institution in Afghanistan,” said Andy M.A. Campbell, the Afghanistan country director for the National Democratic Institute. “They have been around for decades.”
Others who have worked with the group described it as culturally sensitive to the Muslim values of Afghanistan and staffed by foreigners committed to long-term development work in the country. “This is not a Mickey Mouse organization,” said a person who has worked for and evaluated the organization’s projects in the past.
Obviously WaPo reporter Joshua Partlow saw religion as absolutely central to this story, even though at the time police had not ruled robbery out as a motive. (They have now.) And religion, or at least perceptions of religious motivations, were integral. From the looks of it, this was a unholy war between the Taliban and 10 foreigners who had uprooted their lives to help those in this unbelievably poor war-torn country.
Now let’s compare that to how the Los Angeles Times approached this story. (Am I the only who gets a lump in his throat when he sees “Los Angeles Times” mentioned here?) Welcome to Burying the Lede 101.
After five paragraphs, making this tragedy sound like just another war story, eporters Laura King and My-Thuan Tran wrote:
The Taliban claimed responsibility for the aid workers’ deaths, saying those killed were spies and preachers of Christianity. The details provided in statements by spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid suggested that the killers were insurgents and not bandits, who also roam freely in the area.
OK, so it took an extra paragraph — significant because the top five paragraphs of a daily news article are supposed to provide a snapshot of the important themes that will be developed with the remaining column inches — but we got there. Except this is really all we get, other than this paragraph buried toward to bottom of the story:
The International Assistance Mission, which has been working in Afghanistan since 1966, describes itself as a charitable nonprofit Christian organization. One of its major projects is a chain of eye hospitals and clinics. The group’s website says its expatriate workers are volunteers.
Instead of digging into the religious implications and motivations behind both this attack and this International Assistance Mission’s being in Afghanistan, readers are given a few dispatches from the departed. Karen Woo, known as Explorer Kitten, shared this experience:
“Ridiculous I know but several tense minutes were spent thinking through the consequences of bonding with the women of the village … only to find that nail polish is considered to be the devil’s sporn or at the very least the mark of a [harlot] and that my actions are punishable by death,” she wrote. “I contemplate not wearing any myself but decide that toes a la nude is a mistake and that I should just risk it with a neutral shade.”
That’s interesting, a compelling detail even. But it’s not central to this story. It’s milk, not meat. The LAT needed to offer both.
PHOTO: Dr. Thomas Grams, treating an Afghan child days before the doctor was murdered
Written by: Brad A. Greenberg on August 9, 2010. Posted at 3:33 pm | Print | Permalink | Trackback | Comments (7) 7 Responses to “The Taliban’s Christian victims” Dave says: August 9, 2010, at 4:34 pmDoes no one think the Taliban is clever enough to put out a cover story? That when they kill a cohort of helpful foreigners because getting the locals dependent on foreign assistance is contrary to Taliban political goals, they lack the wit to claim evangelizing when they know that to be false? Hello, journalists, this is a ruthless band of murderers we’re talking about!
trierr says: August 9, 2010, at 5:42 pmWhat I find interesting is the use of the term proselytize which I have seen in several reports. Now, maybe I’m being a bit too technical, but Lausanne 1974 notes a difference between evangelism and proselytizing. Is the use of the term important? I’m not sure. I’d like to know whether the group did any evangelism at all or if the use of the term proselytize is being used interchangeably. Obviously, Muslim are very sensitive to any form of evangelisation so the Taliban claim is obviously designed to generate sympathy for the senseless murder of people who helped some of the poorest among them.
Bill P. says: August 9, 2010, at 6:53 pmWouldn’t it be helpful if journalists here put such an event in historical context by stating that many Christians were known always for risking life and limb to help the poor and drying? Since historians often attribute such activities to Christianity’s early allure, especially in the rather uncharitable days of antiquity and among the proto-European tribes invading Rome, it would seem appropriate to acknowledge this historic dynamic if indeed it might help one understand the motives of (and the risks taken by) the victims.
Deacon John M. Bresnahan says: August 9, 2010, at 7:35 pmBill P.—Good point. Whole religious orders were organized in the Middle Ages to run hospitals and care for the sick. Just as “jihad” is an integral part of Islam, caring for the sick of any or no faith (even the horribly contagious lepers -see life of St. Francis of Assisi and the Franciscans for example) is an integral part of Christianity. But, I fear the media will ignore the history and turn this story on its head to the detriment of these noble souls who were murdered. Or, the story will quickly disappear since it goes against the media’s narrative of a noble, peaceful Islam such as James Carroll’s bizarre column in today’s Boston Globe that turns history inside out.
Brad A. Greenberg says: August 9, 2010, at 7:46 pmA religion story that provides context? What a novel idea.
Passing By says: August 9, 2010, at 8:03 pmNBC had the nicest piece on this tonight. It identified them as “Christian relief workers” and had a couple of other faith references insert naturally and without controversy. The simply introduced each one of the killed and told a bit about each of them.
Sorry I can’t find the video online. Maybe someone better at searching can come up with it.
Kevin J Jones says: August 9, 2010, at 9:45 pmMore background: in early June angry Afghanis burned the Pope in effigy after a non-Catholic charity associated with the Natl. Council of Churches was accused of proselytism.
Leave a Reply Name [Required]: Email [Required]: Your blog/website:GetReligion will not publish, sell or share your email address, or send you spam. When we notice posts without names or email addresses, we will delete them. Why? Read our Comments/TrackBacks policy.
WARNINGYour browser does not support JavaScript or has JavaScript disabled!
This will not compromise the possibility to leave a comment, although the automatic insertion of both markup tags and emoticons will not work.
Markup Controlspowered by C4F Textarea Toolbar
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail
_uacct = "UA-127478-3";urchinTracker(); woopraTracker.track();The answer depends on which story you read — or at least how far into each story you read.
See, the Associated Press, The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post each tell readers within the first five paragraphs that Taliban gunned down 10 members of a foreign aid team because they claimed they believed they were foreign spies there to preach Christianity.
The WaPo, for example, gives details early about the International Assistance Mission, via it’s executive director Dirk Frans:
The group is registered as a Christian nonprofit organization. Although its members do not shy away from this affiliation in this conservative Muslim country, Frans and others said they do not proselytize. In their work since 1966 on health and economic development projects, under King Zahir Shah, the Russians, the mujaheddin government and the Taliban, Frans said, “all along we’ve been known as a Christian organization. That has been a nonissue.”
“This is truly a bedrock institution in Afghanistan,” said Andy M.A. Campbell, the Afghanistan country director for the National Democratic Institute. “They have been around for decades.”
Others who have worked with the group described it as culturally sensitive to the Muslim values of Afghanistan and staffed by foreigners committed to long-term development work in the country. “This is not a Mickey Mouse organization,” said a person who has worked for and evaluated the organization’s projects in the past.
Obviously WaPo reporter Joshua Partlow saw religion as absolutely central to this story, even though at the time police had not ruled robbery out as a motive. (They have now.) And religion, or at least perceptions of religious motivations, were integral. From the looks of it, this was a unholy war between the Taliban and 10 foreigners who had uprooted their lives to help those in this unbelievably poor war-torn country.
Now let’s compare that to how the Los Angeles Times approached this story. (Am I the only who gets a lump in his throat when he sees “Los Angeles Times” mentioned here?) Welcome to Burying the Lede 101.
After five paragraphs, making this tragedy sound like just another war story, eporters Laura King and My-Thuan Tran wrote:
The Taliban claimed responsibility for the aid workers’ deaths, saying those killed were spies and preachers of Christianity. The details provided in statements by spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid suggested that the killers were insurgents and not bandits, who also roam freely in the area.
OK, so it took an extra paragraph — significant because the top five paragraphs of a daily news article are supposed to provide a snapshot of the important themes that will be developed with the remaining column inches — but we got there. Except this is really all we get, other than this paragraph buried toward to bottom of the story:
The International Assistance Mission, which has been working in Afghanistan since 1966, describes itself as a charitable nonprofit Christian organization. One of its major projects is a chain of eye hospitals and clinics. The group’s website says its expatriate workers are volunteers.
Instead of digging into the religious implications and motivations behind both this attack and this International Assistance Mission’s being in Afghanistan, readers are given a few dispatches from the departed. Karen Woo, known as Explorer Kitten, shared this experience:
“Ridiculous I know but several tense minutes were spent thinking through the consequences of bonding with the women of the village … only to find that nail polish is considered to be the devil’s sporn or at the very least the mark of a [harlot] and that my actions are punishable by death,” she wrote. “I contemplate not wearing any myself but decide that toes a la nude is a mistake and that I should just risk it with a neutral shade.”
That’s interesting, a compelling detail even. But it’s not central to this story. It’s milk, not meat. The LAT needed to offer both.
PHOTO: Dr. Thomas Grams, treating an Afghan child days before the doctor was murdered
Does no one think the Taliban is clever enough to put out a cover story? That when they kill a cohort of helpful foreigners because getting the locals dependent on foreign assistance is contrary to Taliban political goals, they lack the wit to claim evangelizing when they know that to be false? Hello, journalists, this is a ruthless band of murderers we’re talking about!
What I find interesting is the use of the term proselytize which I have seen in several reports. Now, maybe I’m being a bit too technical, but Lausanne 1974 notes a difference between evangelism and proselytizing. Is the use of the term important? I’m not sure. I’d like to know whether the group did any evangelism at all or if the use of the term proselytize is being used interchangeably. Obviously, Muslim are very sensitive to any form of evangelisation so the Taliban claim is obviously designed to generate sympathy for the senseless murder of people who helped some of the poorest among them.
Wouldn’t it be helpful if journalists here put such an event in historical context by stating that many Christians were known always for risking life and limb to help the poor and drying? Since historians often attribute such activities to Christianity’s early allure, especially in the rather uncharitable days of antiquity and among the proto-European tribes invading Rome, it would seem appropriate to acknowledge this historic dynamic if indeed it might help one understand the motives of (and the risks taken by) the victims.
Bill P.—Good point. Whole religious orders were organized in the Middle Ages to run hospitals and care for the sick. Just as “jihad” is an integral part of Islam, caring for the sick of any or no faith (even the horribly contagious lepers -see life of St. Francis of Assisi and the Franciscans for example) is an integral part of Christianity. But, I fear the media will ignore the history and turn this story on its head to the detriment of these noble souls who were murdered. Or, the story will quickly disappear since it goes against the media’s narrative of a noble, peaceful Islam such as James Carroll’s bizarre column in today’s Boston Globe that turns history inside out.
A religion story that provides context? What a novel idea.
NBC had the nicest piece on this tonight. It identified them as “Christian relief workers” and had a couple of other faith references insert naturally and without controversy. The simply introduced each one of the killed and told a bit about each of them.
Sorry I can’t find the video online. Maybe someone better at searching can come up with it.
More background: in early June angry Afghanis burned the Pope in effigy after a non-Catholic charity associated with the Natl. Council of Churches was accused of proselytism.
GetReligion will not publish, sell or share your email address, or send you spam. When we notice posts without names or email addresses, we will delete them. Why? Read our Comments/TrackBacks policy.
Your browser does not support JavaScript or has JavaScript disabled!
This will not compromise the possibility to leave a comment, although the automatic insertion of both markup tags and emoticons will not work.
Read Full Article »