In a remarkably short period of time, Representative Michele Bachmann has been transformed from a fringe figure, known mainly for her abrasive and often inaccurate attacks on the president and other Democrats, into a legitimate presidential candidate. The latest national poll of Republicans (from Public Policy Polling) shows her pulling ahead of long-time front-runner Mitt Romney. The latest poll of likely Caucus-goers in Iowa has the same result. She’s even gaining rapidly on Romney in New Hampshire, and making a splash in many other states. She is now poised to win the first real contest of the cycle, the Iowa GOP Straw Poll on August 13, and could do so in a way that destroys the candidacy of her fellow Minnesotan and one-time smart-money favorite for the nomination, Tim Pawlenty.
But now that Bachmann is the real deal, her candidacy is about to endure its toughest moments yet—including intensified scrutiny of her background and character (which is already very much under way), unrealistic expectations for her candidacy, a possible existential threat from Governor Rick Perry, and GOP elite misgivings about her electability. In the coming months, this multi-faceted stress test might just send her back to obscurity well before the first delegate-selection events in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina even take place.
Heightened scrutiny of Bachmann has already begun, notably in the form of derision towards her husband, Marcus, whose Christian counseling firm and effeminate mannerisms have drawn horselaughs from such media figures as Jon Stewart, and claims in a Daily Caller piece that she suffers from “incapacitating” migraine headaches and heavy medication to combat them. So far Bachmann has done well, largely ignoring the mockery about her husband and denying the reports that she might be medically unfit to serve as president (she’s sought to turn the innuendoes around by identifying herself with the “30 million Americans [who] experience migraines that are easily controlled with medication.”) But you have to figure there is a lot more to come, including a more thorough examination of long-standing reports of instability on her congressional staff. And while a handful of progressive journalists have sought to draw attention to her extremist background (particularly her association with “Dominionist” thinkers who argue that America should be transformed into a Christian theocracy), only now can we expect the mainstream media to follow the scent and ask their own questions.
Moreover, heightened expectations surrounding Bachmann’s recent surge in the polls could also pose a problem. Iowa observers are wondering if she’s spending enough quality time in the state to satisfy the demands of its conservative activists, or building the kind of statewide organization necessary to get supporters to Ames for the Straw Poll. And she’s already a bit handicapped by the fact that two of her biggest likely stealth supporters in the state, Representative Steve King and social conservative kingmaker Bob Vander Plaats, have promised to stay neutral until after the Straw Poll. But anything short of a Bachmann victory in Ames will be billed as disappointing, and if Tim Pawlenty manages to parlay his sizable state-level organization into an upset win (unlikely but possible), all bets are off as T-Paw could recapture his early claim to be the “true conservative alternative to Mitt Romney.”
Probably the biggest challenge to Bachmann, however, may be developing down in Texas. Rick Perry, whose minions have been burning up the phone lines to potential donors, is already generating excitement (and regular double-digit poll showings) as a candidate with all of Bachmann’s appeal to Christian Right and Tea Party activists, but much better credibility with the GOP establishment and a tailor-made “story to tell” to the entire electorate about his state’s superior record generating jobs. One leading Republican observer suggested recently that Perry’s entrance into the race would instantly make it a three-way contest between Perry, Romney, and the eventual Iowa winner. Another replied that a Perry campaign could make the Iowa winner irrelevant. And that’s aside from the fact that Perry would be likely to contest Iowa as well. This weekend, in fact, the Iowa State GOP might choose to put Perry on the Straw Poll ballot even though he’s given no formal indication he’s going to run.
One indicator of the threat Perry poses to Bachmann’s base of support is the growing involvement of a broad array of Christian Right figures, including such warhorses as James Dobson and Richard Land, in the August 6 prayer gathering the governor is hosting in Houston. As Religion Dispatch’s Sarah Posner puts it, “The religious right is signing on en masse” to the event. This infatuation with Perry has to be disturbing to Bachmann, a graduate of Oral Roberts University’s law school and a long-time soldier in Christian Right causes.
Finally, even if Bachmann can maintain her lead in Iowa, she has yet to win over conservative elites, even among those whose views are as reliably extreme as her own. Any plausible path to the nomination for Bachmann includes a win in South Carolina, a state whose Republican voters are a lot like those of Iowa, with the exception that the Palmetto State’s Tea Party movement is highly organized and active. But early indications are that Senator Jim DeMint, himself an important national power-broker, has succeeded in convincing most SC pols and donors to “keep their powder dry” in the presidential contest until such time as he has scrutinized the candidates and made his own choice. Bachmann, who visibly annoyed DeMint by initially refusing to take the “cut, cap, and balance” pledge on the debt limit issue (she eventually relented after previously vowing to vote against the CCB legislation on grounds that a repeal of ObamaCare should also be a condition of any debt limit increase), is not off to a great start in the DeMint Primary. It also doesn’t help her with party elites that she’s closely (if somewhat unfairly) associated with Sarah Palin, and thus might be expected to emulate Palin’s pattern of steadily growing disapproval ratings from political independents and more moderate Republicans. While Bachmann is faring better than Palin against Barack Obama in the few recent trial heat polls that have appeared, her approval-disapproval split among the general electorate isn’t very promising (29/45 in a recent PPP survey).
So there are storm clouds amidst the bright skies ahead for Michele Bachmann as we enter the Dog Days of the invisible primary leading into 2012. If she hopes to hold on, she’d better batten down the hatches for a very rough ride.
Ed Kilgore is a special correspondent for The New Republic.
Perry in the end will not run. There is some truth in the gay rumors and things would come out if he really made a run for it.
Perry in the end will not run. There is some truth in the gay rumors and things would come out if he really made a run for it.
Bachman is "Palin 2.0," a model of candidate not quite ready yet for prime time. Perhaps we need to be frightened when the 3.0 model comes out of the time machine from the future, Terminatora-like.
Bachman is "Palin 2.0," a model of candidate not quite ready yet for prime time. Perhaps we need to be frightened when the 3.0 model comes out of the time machine from the future, Terminatora-like.
Perry will run, and win. waste no more time on Michelle Bachmann until she gets nominated to be the first female Sec Treasury...(I am still hoping that nomination will be Sheila Bair)yeah, any rumours about Rick Perry being gay might have a tiny root in 1970's bi-swinging...when he was still a Democrat in the US Air Force and helping out on the family coton farm :)
Perry will run, and win. waste no more time on Michelle Bachmann until she gets nominated to be the first female Sec Treasury...(I am still hoping that nomination will be Sheila Bair)yeah, any rumours about Rick Perry being gay might have a tiny root in 1970's bi-swinging...when he was still a Democrat in the US Air Force and helping out on the family coton farm :)
The popularity of Michele Bachmann must be mystifying in TNR's insular H Street warren. I'm reminded of Pauline Kael's famous incredulity after Nixon crushed McGovern in 1972: "How can that be? I don't know a single person who voted for Nixon." But then I don't know a single live person who supports the kneejerk "progressive" politics of The Two Jonathans.
The popularity of Michele Bachmann must be mystifying in TNR's insular H Street warren. I'm reminded of Pauline Kael's famous incredulity after Nixon crushed McGovern in 1972: "How can that be? I don't know a single person who voted for Nixon." But then I don't know a single live person who supports the kneejerk "progressive" politics of The Two Jonathans.
Once again the liberal press has allowed a candidate of the extreme right-wing, a bigoted fundamentalist Christian hack, likely a member or former member of the John Birch Society,a "constitutional conservative," to move to center stage without a comprehensive investigation of background, memberships and affliations and educational credentials.
Why am I not suprised by this gutless behavior?
Once again the liberal press has allowed a candidate of the extreme right-wing, a bigoted fundamentalist Christian hack, likely a member or former member of the John Birch Society,a "constitutional conservative," to move to center stage without a comprehensive investigation of background, memberships and affliations and educational credentials.
Why am I not suprised by this gutless behavior?
Not a bad piece Ed, but I agree with Westendorf on a key point. Those of us who have watched Bachmann's seemingly improbably rise in Minnesota have learned to never underestimate her ability. She has a clear message that appears to resonate with a particularly active part of the Republican base and she is an amazing retail campaigner. She's clearly not the insider's candidate and as Westendorf points out, I think you're still talking to too many insiders.
I do agree that her problem now seems to be that she might be spreading herself too thinly, which may re-invigorate Pawlenty if he can either win or get close in Iowa. I wouldn't put odds one way or another on that happening.
The real thr ... view full comment
Not a bad piece Ed, but I agree with Westendorf on a key point. Those of us who have watched Bachmann's seemingly improbably rise in Minnesota have learned to never underestimate her ability. She has a clear message that appears to resonate with a particularly active part of the Republican base and she is an amazing retail campaigner. She's clearly not the insider's candidate and as Westendorf points out, I think you're still talking to too many insiders.
I do agree that her problem now seems to be that she might be spreading herself too thinly, which may re-invigorate Pawlenty if he can either win or get close in Iowa. I wouldn't put odds one way or another on that happening.
The real threat, as you point out, may come from Perry. I've always seen him as the credible conservative threat (Pawlenty for all his posturing is still an establishment guy) to Romney and while Bachmann's rise has forced his hand somewhat, his waiting game may pay off. The prospect of a Perry/Pawlenty ticket crossed my mind the other day and I wouldn't be surprised if that happened.
I find the recent media frenzy around Bachmann's migraines pretty amusing. Yeah. Migraines. That's what makes unfit to be president. Being batsh*t crazy is OK.
I find the recent media frenzy around Bachmann's migraines pretty amusing. Yeah. Migraines. That's what makes unfit to be president. Being batsh*t crazy is OK.
The God of the Fundy Xtian repub party has a very strange sense of humor. The whole lot these "candydates" are vapid, banal idiots.
The problem is not "once again the liberal press" but rather the RNC and this silly system that gives ridiculous amounts of power to a small group of people in Iowa, financed by the most corrupt money machine in history (the 21st century circus of financing the ongoing sale of our government to corporate interests) .
Read Full Article »